Senate
Bill 221 will greatly improve safety for Ohio’s drivers
January 31, 2006
Testimony of Brian Newbacher
Director of Public Affairs
AAA East Central
Chairman
Armbruster, members of the Committee, my name is Brian Newbacher. I
am director of public affairs for AAA East Central and I am here at
the request of the Ohio Conference of AAA Clubs, which represents 2.5
million Ohio AAA members.
Before
I begin, I would also like to acknowledge the presence today of the
Columbus Division of Police in uniform in the back of the room. Thank
you for being here to support the Ohio Teen Driver Coalition.
If
you didn't already know that traffic crashes are the No. 1 killer of
teen-agers in America, you're not alone. In a national survey conducted
by AAA, only 22 percent identified traffic crashes as the greatest
threat to teens. In fact, traffic crashes account for 40 percent of
all deaths among 15-20 year olds, making them the leading cause of
death for this age group; more than suicide or drugs.
We applaud
the General Assembly for its early efforts to make teen driving safer
with the passage of Ohio’s original graduated licensing legislation.
However, eight years ago, Ohio’s GDL did not include restrictions
for passengers. Ohio’s law also changed the age for a learner’s
permit from 16 to 15 ½.
As you
consider the merits of Senate Bill 221, which moves the age for
a learner’s
permit back to age 16, lengthens the night-time driving curfew by two
hours and adds a passenger restriction, I respectfully urge you to
remember that crashes involving teen drivers affect more than the teen
drivers themselves.
In fact,
nearly two of every three people killed in teen driver crashes are
people other than the teen driver (according to the AAA Traffic Safety Foundation,
which released its analysis about two weeks ago).
Here in
Ohio, 1,173 lives were lost in crashes involving young novice drivers
from 1995 to 2004.
Of these, 428 were drivers between 15 and 17 years old,
386 were their passengers, 289 were occupants of other vehicles and
70 were non-motorists. (64
percent in crashes were other than the teen driver)
Teen drivers
also present a danger to others on the road—someone’s mother
driving in an oncoming vehicle, a child riding a bike, or a grandparent
out for an evening walk.
Approximately 70 percent of Ohio’s fatalities
happened on rural roads. Concern may be expressed by some parents in
smaller communities that passenger restrictions associated with graduated
licensing may prove to be a burden.
To alleviate these concerns, I would like to point out a study conducted
in North Carolina, which does have passenger restrictions and a curfew
from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. In the study, parents (in both rural and urban
counties) indicated they “don’t find the additional time
required of them to be a (particularly) large intrusion.”
About
96 percent of parents in rural and urban counties alike said they approve
of North Carolina’s (graduated licensing) system. [Among
15-17 year-olds there, about 80 percent (in both urban and rural counties)
voiced their approval.]
But more
importantly, the results tell the tale. Evaluations of North Carolina’s
(GDL) system show the benefits to teenagers in all areas of the state. Crashes
involving 16-year-old drivers declined by 25 percent in urban counties
and by 30 percent in rural ones (comparing 1999 to 1997).
AAA urges
you to recognize that teen probationary drivers face much greater dangers
with other teens in the car.
Teenage
passengers create distractions for drivers who are inexperienced and
who need to focus their attention to the road.
The age
group most affected by licensing policies — 16 year-olds — has
by far the highest crash risk of drivers of any age. Nationally, the
crash risk per mile driven by 16 year-olds is nearly three times that
of 18-19 year-olds and 10 times the risk of drivers ages 30-59.
The
crash type most often associated with teenage drivers, especially 16
year-olds, is the single-vehicle, run-off-the-road collision involving
speeding and multiple teen passengers —the very type of crash
often caused by immaturity and poor decision-making.
For a teen
driver, the presence of even one passenger almost doubles the crash
risk of driving alone. With two or more passengers, the risk spikes to five
times (according to research by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety).
Passenger
restrictions can involve some inconvenience for parents. Still, surveys
of parents and teens show strong support for passenger restrictions where they
are in effect.
For example,
California’s graduated licensing law went into effect in 1998
and was the first to include a meaningful passenger restriction. No
passengers younger than 20 are allowed in the vehicle during the first
6 months unless an adult 25 or older is present. (84 percent of
parents surveyed favored this provision – IIHS
survey)
Passenger
restrictions in California have been well tolerated … only 8
percent of parents surveyed there said inconveniences were frequent
or major. (The number of teenage passengers of 16-year-old drivers
decreased by about 25% in the first three years after California’s
passenger restriction became effective.) (Journal of Safety Research,
36, 2005, pp 1-14)
If you’re
uncertain about how your constituents will feel about this bill I can
tell you with great confidence that AAA members overwhelmingly understand the
importance of passing this legislation.
In a recent
survey conducted by the Ohio Conference of AAA Clubs, 81 percent favored
passenger restrictions for probationary license holders.
I can also
tell you that GDL laws in 33 other states include passenger restrictions. (Requirements
vary as to whether this restriction applies to all passengers or
to teenagers only; the number of passengers; and whether family members
are exempt.)
Twenty eight
of these states have the same restriction (no more than one passenger)
that Senator Cates and Representative Raga propose (HI, IL, MT, NH, NJ, NC,
OK, RI, TN, TX, VA, WI, WY to name some).
This bill
also increases the length of the probationary license from 12 to 18
months. This is a key provision because it decreases a teenage driver’s
exposure to risky driving situations.
Mr.
Chairman, committee members, please take this golden opportunity to
make driving safer for our teens and for all Ohioans who share the road with
them.
AAA supports
all of the provisions in Senate Bill 221 as written. As a member of
the Ohio Teen Driver Coalition, I urge you to vote in favor of this
legislation. Thank you.